How many players have this combination of measurables? How rare or impressive is this number over the last 10 years? Does this tend to translate from college to the NFL?
One of the biggest benefits of working at PFF this time of year is the ability to find answers to most of these questions, which often pop up when studying draft prospects.
Most of the threshold cutoffs used in this piece are arbitrary, but this is less an exercise in making definitive conclusions and more about showing the company these prospects are keeping and a way to put their production and measurables in context. And that starts with the position everyone wants to talk about — quarterback.
More PFF draft content:
LIVE Draft Tracker | Mock Draft Simulator | 2023 NFL Draft Guide
Top 200 Big Board | PFF Mock Drafts | Measureables & Workout Data
NCAA Premium Stats | Draft Rankings By Position | Prospect Superlatives
How much of an outlier is Bryce Young’s projected playing weight?
Young’s size has been discussed ad nauseam through the pre-draft process, so I’ll keep this brief. He weighed in at 204 pounds at the scouting combine, but his playing weight is expected to be closer to 190.
An anonymous AFC front office executive told The Athletic’s Dan Pompei that Young's “weight was manufactured for the Combine, then his agents didn’t allow him to get weighed at his pro day. He’s a 185-to-190-pound guy frame-wise.”
Even using 200 pounds as the threshold — assuming Young can add some real weight in the NFL — the list of quarterbacks to see significant playing time is thin. The only two quarterbacks with more than 1,000 snaps played since 2006 while listed at 200 pounds or less are Jeff Garcia and Seneca Wallace. No quarterback has logged a snap over that same time frame at 195 pounds or less.
Young’s track record of success at Alabama and natural ability to play the position is going to have a team betting on an outlier in the modern NFL at the top of the first round.
In a stacked Ohio State offense, how much can C.J. Stroud’s success be attributed to himself versus his surrounding talent?
The goal of metrics such as PFF Wins Above Replacement (at the NFL level) and PFF Wins Above Average (at the college level) is to approximate value added by individual players.
Comparing a quarterback’s WAA to the WAA for his supporting cast on offense (running backs, wide receivers, tight ends and offensive line) is one way to examine how much credit should go to the quarterback versus the rest of the offense as a whole.
Stroud is one of the more impressive prospects from an individual contribution standpoint, ranking third in WAA among the top 15 consensus quarterbacks — behind just Bryce Young and Clayton Tune. But it’s also clear that the only quarterback who had close to a similar supporting cast over the past two seasons was back-to-back national champion Stetson Bennett at Georgia.
Depending on where Stroud lands, there’s a very real chance that he plays with a worse receiving corps than what he had at Ohio State with Garrett Wilson, Chris Olave, Jaxon Smith-Njigba and Marvin Harrison Jr., among others.
Get the 2023 Fantasy Draft Kit for FREE
with annual plan
DRAFT KIT: NEW Unlimited League Sync
DRAFT KIT: NEW Live Draft Assistant powered by AI & PFF Data
DRAFT KIT: NEW Mock Draft Sim customized for your league
DRAFT KIT: NEW Expert Strategy & Player Data Deep Dive Content
DRAFT KIT: Customizable Cheat Sheets, Rankings, and Projections
DRAFT KIT: Dynasty, Best Ball, and IDP Expert Rankings
Nathan Jahnkes Rankings - #1 Most Accurate Last 70 Weeks
NEW Line-up Optimizer with Start/Sit and Waiver Wire recommendations
WR-CB and OL-DL Matchup Tools with PFF Player Grades
Player Utilization Report and Offensive Line rankings and data
Best Bets, Player Props and Futures betting tools
NFL Mock Draft Sim, PFF Grades & NFL/NCAA Premium Stats 2.0
Already have a subscription? Log In
© 2023 PFF - all rights reserved.